Autors: Karlova-Sergieva, V. A., Grasiani, B. S., Nikolova, N. G.
Title: An Integrated Cyber-Physical Digital Twin Architecture with Quantitative Feedback Theory Robust Control for NIS2-Aligned Industrial Robotics
Keywords: cyber-physical systems, cybersecurity, digital twin, industrial communication, industrial robots, Industry 4.0, NIS2 directive, PLC-based control, QFT robust control

Abstract: Highlights: What are the main findings? The proposed cyber-physical digital twin with QFT and NIS2 security (CPDTQN) achieves high-precision joint and Tool Center Point (TCP) tracking under parametric uncertainty, worst-case dynamics, and external disturbances. Secure PLC-MATLAB-ROBOGUIDE integration demonstrates real-time consistency between simulation and twin execution, with negligible latency introduced by NIS2-aligned security mechanisms. What are the implications of the main findings? The CPDTQN architecture enables reliable deployment of robust controllers in industrial Operational Technology (OT) environments, maintaining stability even under communication delays, jitter, and cyber-resilience enforcement layers. Digital twin-based validation provides a safe, repeatable, and traceable framework for verifying control robustness, cyber-resilience, and regulatory (NIS2) compliance prior to physical deployment. This article presents an integrated framework for robust control and cybersecurity of an industrial robot, combining Quantitative Feedback Theory (QFT), digital twin (DT) technology, and a programmable logic controller–based architecture aligned with the requirements of the NIS2 Directive. The study considers a five-axis industrial manipulator modeled as a set of decoupled linear single-input single-output systems subject to parametric uncertainty and external disturbances. For position control of each axis, closed-loop robust systems with QFT-based controllers and prefilters are designed, and the dynamic behavior of the system is evaluated using predefined key performance indicators (KPIs), including tracking errors in joint space and tool space, maximum error, root-mean-square error, and three-dimensional positional deviation. The proposed architecture executes robust control algorithms in the MATLAB/Simulink environment, while a programmable logic controller provides deterministic communication, time synchronization, and secure data exchange. The synchronized digital twin, implemented in the FANUC ROBOGUIDE environment, reproduces the robot’s kinematics and dynamics in real time, enabling realistic hardware-in-the-loop validation with a real programmable logic controller. This work represents one of the first architectures that simultaneously integrates robust control, real programmable logic controller-based execution, a synchronized digital twin, and NIS2-oriented mechanisms for observability and traceability. The conducted simulation and digital twin-based experimental studies under nominal and worst-case dynamic models, as well as scenarios with externally applied single-axis disturbances, demonstrate that the system maintains robustness and tracking accuracy within the prescribed performance criteria. In addition, the study analyzes how the proposed architecture supports the implementation of key NIS2 principles, including command traceability, disturbance resilience, access control, and capabilities for incident analysis and event traceability in robotic manufacturing systems.

References

  1. Siciliano B. Khatib O. Springer Handbook of Robotics 2nd ed. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2016 10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1
  2. Spong M.W. Hutchinson S. Vidyasagar M. Robot Modeling and Control 2nd ed. Wiley Hoboken, NJ, USA 2020 978-1-119-52404-5
  3. Khalil W. Dombre E. Modeling, Identification and Control of Robots 2nd ed. Butterworth-Heinemann Waltham, MA, USA 2002 10.1115/1.1566397
  4. Åström K.J. Murray R.M. Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ, USA 2021 9780691193984
  5. Lewis F.L. Xie L. Popa D.L. Optimal and Robust Estimation CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2017 10.1201/9781315221656
  6. ISO 10218-1:2025 Robots—Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots The International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland 2025
  7. Lu Y. Liu C. Wang K.I.-K. Huang H. Xu X. Digital Twin-driven smart manufacturing: Connotation, reference model, applications and research issues Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2020 61 101837 10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101837
  8. Horowitz I.M. Quantitative Feedback Design Theory IEEE Press Piscataway, NJ, USA 1992 100963576003/139780963576002
  9. Bhattacharyya S.P. Chapellat H. Keel L.H. Robust Control: The Parametric Approach Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA 1995 978-0-13-781576-0
  10. Garcia-Sanz M. Houpis C. Wind Energy Systems, Control Engineering Design CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA 2012 9781439821794
  11. Luh J.Y.S. Walker M.W. Paul R.P.C. Resolved-Acceleration Control for Mechanical Manipulators IEEE TAC 1980 25 468 474 10.1109/TAC.1980.1102367
  12. Kukushkin K. Ryabov Y. Borovkov A. Digital Twins: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Data Analysis and Topic Modeling Data 2022 7 173 10.3390/data7120173
  13. Boje E. Multivariable quantitative feedback design for tracking error specifications Automatica 2002 38 131 138 10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00177-7
  14. Tao F. Cheng J. Qi Q. Zhang M. Zhang H. Sui F. Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2018 94 3563 3576 10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1
  15. Qi Q. Tao F. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison IEEE Access 2018 6 3585 3593 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265
  16. Kritzinger W. Karner M. Traar G. Henjes J. Sihn W. Digital Twin in Manufacturing: A Categorical Literature Review and Classification IFAC-PapersOnLine 2018 51 1016 1022 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474
  17. Jones D. Snider C. Nassehi A. Yon J. Hicks B. Characterising the Digital Twin: A Systematic Literature Review CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2020 29 36 52 10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002
  18. Iliuţă M.-E. Moisescu M.-A. Pop E. Ionita A.-D. Caramihai S.-I. Mitulescu T.-C. Digital Twin-A Review of the Evolution from Concept to Technology and Its Analytical Perspectives on Applications in Various Fields Appl. Sci. 2024 14 5454 10.3390/app14135454
  19. Jørgensen B.N. Ma Z.G. Digital Twins Under EU Law: A Unified Compliance Framework Across Smart Cities, Industry, Transportation, and Energy Systems Electronics 2025 14 4881 10.3390/electronics14244881
  20. Ruzarovsky R. Horak T. Zelník R. Skypala R. Csekei M. Šido J. Nemlaha E. Kopcek M. Development and Validation of Digital Twin Behavioural Model for Virtual Commissioning of Cyber-Physical System Appl. Sci. 2025 15 2859 10.3390/app15052859
  21. Calderón D. Folgado F.J. González I. Calderón A.J. Development and real-world implementation of a Digital Twin-enhanced supervisory system for RES-green hydrogen microgrid Energy Convers. Manag. 2026 348 120822 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120822
  22. European Parliament and Council of the European Union Directive (EU) 2022/2555 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS-2 Directive) Off. J. Eur. Union 2022 333 80 152
  23. ENISA Technical Implementation Guidance for NIS2 Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures European Union Agency for Cybersecurity Heraklion, Greece 2024
  24. Mentzelou K. Chountalas P.T. Kitsios F.C. Magoutas A.I. Dasaklis T.K. Identifying and Modeling Barriers to Compliance with the NIS2 Directive: A DEMATEL Approach J. Cybersecur. Priv. 2025 5 97 10.3390/jcp5040097
  25. Kelemen R. Squillace J. Medvácz Á. Cappella J. Bucko B. Mazuch M. Cybersecurity Regulations and Software Resilience: Strengthening Awareness and Societal Stability Soc. Sci. 2025 14 578 10.3390/socsci14100578
  26. Shao G. Helu M. Framework for a Digital Twin in Manufacturing: Scope and Requirements Manuf. Lett. 2020 24 105 107 10.1016/j.mfglet.2020.04.004
  27. Rasheed A. San O. Kvamsdal T. Digital Twin: Values, Challenges and Enablers arXiv 2019 10.48550/arXiv.1910.01719 1910.01719
  28. Duan L. Tian Z. Digital Twin-Based System Design and Optimization: A Survey Appl. Syst. Innov. 2021 4 85 10.3390/asi4040085
  29. Wu H. Ji P. Ma H. Xing L. A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin from the Perspective of Total Process: Data, Models, Networks and Applications Sensors 2023 23 8306 10.3390/s23198306
  30. Tao F. Zhang M. Digital Twin Shop-Floor: A New Shop-Floor Paradigm Towards Smart Manufacturing IEEE Access 2017 5 20418 20427 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2756069
  31. Liang X. Xiao R. Zhang J. A Review on Digital Twin for Robotics in Smart Manufacturing Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 17th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA) Chengdu, China 16–19 December 2022 1510 1515 10.1109/ICIEA54703.2022.10006119
  32. Moyne J. Qamsane Y. Balta E.C. Kovalenko I. Faris J. Barton K. Tilbury D.M. A Requirements Driven Digital Twin Framework: Specification and Opportunities IEEE Access 2020 8 107781 107801 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000437
  33. Chikurtev D. Ivanov V. Tsvetanov S. Yovchev K. Robot Modeling and Control in Digital Twin System Eng. Proc. 2025 100 62 10.3390/engproc2025100062
  34. Cen Y. Deng J. Chen Y. Liu H. Zhong Z. Fan B. Chang L. Jiang L. Digital Twin-Empowered Robotic Arm Control: An Integrated PPO and Fuzzy PID Approach Mathematics 2025 13 216 10.3390/math13020216
  35. Fu X. He J. Robust Adaptive Control for Robot Manipulators Trajectory Tracking Based on Iterative Learning Observer with Time-Delay Comptes Rendus De L’académie Bulg. Des Sci. 2022 75 886 894 10.7546/CRABS.2022.06.10
  36. Guo H. Robust QFT-Based Position Control of an Asymmetric Electro-Hydraulic Servo System Int. J. Robot. Autom. Technol. 2018 5 1 6 10.31875/2409-9694.2018.05.1
  37. Wang R. Wang C. Di C. Wang Y. Yang D. Xu P. Compliant Control of Robots in Dynamic Uncertain Environments J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2025 3120 012030 10.1088/1742-6596/3120/1/012030
  38. Van M. Kang H.-J. Robust Fault-Tolerant Control for Uncertain Robot Manipulators Based on Adaptive Quasi-Continuous High-Order Sliding Mode and Neural Network Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2015 229 1436 1453 10.1177/0954406214544311
  39. Alcaraz C. López J. Digital Twin: A Comprehensive Survey of Security Threats IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022 24 1475 1503 10.1109/COMST.2022.3171465
  40. Ruohonen J. A Systematic Literature Review on the NIS2 Directive arXiv 2024 10.48550/arXiv.2412.08084 2412.08084
  41. Castiglione G. Santamaria D.F. Bella G. An Ontological Approach to Compliance Verification of the NIS 2 Directive Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops (JOWO 2023) Sherbrooke, QC, Canada 17–20 July 2023 Volume 3637 1 12
  42. Ristvej J. Tonhauser M. Chovanec D. Kubás J. Kollár B. Zamiar Z. Cyber resilience conceptual model for European Union NIS2 standards implementation in Slovakia Sci. Rep. 2025 15 26902 10.1038/s41598-025-12829-3
  43. Slotine J.J.E. Li W. Applied Nonlinear Control Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1991 0-13-040890-5
  44. Garg G. Kuts V. Anbarjafari G. Digital Twin for FANUC Robots: Industrial Robot Programming and Simulation Using Virtual Reality Sustainability 2021 13 10336 10.3390/su131810336
  45. Panasiuk J. Controlling an Industrial Robot Using Stereo 3D Vision Systems with AI Elements Sensors 2025 25 6402 10.3390/s25206402
  46. Qin Q. Liu Z. Zhong R. Wang X.V. Wang L. Wiktorsson M. Wang W. Robot digital twin systems in manufacturing: Technologies, applications, trends and challenges Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2026 97 103103 10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103103
  47. Coppolino L. Nardone R. Petruolo A. Romano L. Souvent A. Exploiting Digital Twin technology for Cybersecurity Monitoring in Smart Grids Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES ’23) Benevento, Italy 29 August–1 September 2023 Association for Computing Machinery New York, NY, USA 2023 1 10 10.1145/3600160.3605043
  48. Chang H.-C. Lin C.-Y. Liao D.-J. Koo T.-M. The Modbus Protocol Vulnerability Test in Industrial Control Systems Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery (CyberC) Chongqing, China 29–30 October 2020 375 378 10.1109/CyberC49757.2020.00070
  49. Schleipen M. Gilani S.-S. Bischoff T. Pfrommer J. OPC UA & Industrie 4.0—Enabling technology with high diversity and variability Procedia CIRP 2016 57 315 320 10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.055
  50. Jaloudi S. Communication Protocols of an Industrial Internet of Things Environment: A Comparative Study Future Internet 2019 11 66 10.3390/fi11030066
  51. Wang Z. Xie W. Wang B. Tao J. Wang E. A survey on recent advanced research of CPS security Appl. Sci. 2021 11 3751 10.3390/app11093751
  52. Kayan H. Nunes M. Rana O. Burnap P. Perera C. Cybersecurity of Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems: A Review ACM Comput. Surv. 2022 54 229 10.1145/3510410
  53. Huang Z. Shen Y. Li J. Fey M. Brecher C. A Survey on AI-Driven Digital Twins in Industry 4.0: Smart Manufacturing and Advanced Robotics Sensors 2021 21 6340 10.3390/s21196340 34640660
  54. Brous P. Janssen M. Herder P. The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020 51 101952 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008
  55. European Commission Industry 5.0 and Digital Transformation Framework European Union Brussels, Belgium 2023
  56. Karlova-Sergieva V. Approach for the Assessment of Stability and Performance in the s- and z-Complex Domains Automation 2025 6 61 10.3390/automation6040061

Issue

Sensors, vol. 26, 2026, Albania, https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020613

Вид: статия в списание, публикация в издание с импакт фактор, публикация в реферирано издание, индексирана в Scopus и Web of Science