Autors: Todorov, G. D., Kamberov, K. H., Semkov M.
Title: Dynamic behavior assessment of an automotive component through virtual prototyping
Keywords:

Abstract: This study aims to demonstrate one of the major advantages of virtual prototyping - assessing design aspects at a very early stage of design development. This is performed in a typical automotive industry area - dynamic behavior of components. The proposed methodology uses numerical methods (Finite Element Analysis) to obtain data for design characteristics and to improve them. An important parameter used in the engineering analysis performed through simulations on virtual prototypes is the damping of the materials. It is determined via experimental testing over a physical prototype to guarantee maximal correspondence of the virtual prototype to the real physical subject of tests. The demonstration uses a case study of a thermal sensor, typical for the automotive industry subjected to a test dynamic load. Two design variants are examined, by varying the length and rigidity of ceramic substrate support. These variants are compared by dynamic stresses acting over both sides of the substrate as a potential danger for crack initiation. Conclusions and recommendations are derived from performed analyses.

References

  1. M. Zimakowska-Laskowska and P. Laskowski, " Emission from internal combustion engines and battery electric vehicles: Case study for Poland," Atmosphere 13 (3), 401 (2022). 10.3390/atmos13030401
  2. R. van Veldhoven, " Sensors for automotive applications: Challenges and solutions," in 5th IEEE International Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces IWASI (Bari, Italy, 2013), (IEEE, 2013), pp. 115-116.
  3. M. H. Westbrook, " Sensors for automotive application," J. Phys. E: Sci. Instrum. 18, 751 (1985). 10.1088/0022-3735/18/9/004
  4. C. S. Nelson, D. Chen, J. Ralph and E. D'Herde, " The development of a RTD temperature sensor for exhaust applications," SAE Transactions, Section 4: Journal of Fuels and Lubricants 113, pp. 686-694 (2004).
  5. A. Tanev, P. Mitsev and T. Lazarova, " Challenging sensing solutions designedby Sensata Bulgaria," Information Technologies and Control 15 (4), pp. 28-39 (2017). 10.1515/itc-2017-0035
  6. J. S. Moya, S. Lopez-Esteban and C. Pecharromán, " The challenge of ceramic/metal microcomposites and nanocomposites," Progress in Materials Science 52, pp. 1017-1090 (2007). 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.09.003
  7. B. Gilev, M. Andreev, N. Hinov and G. Angelov, " Modeling and simulation of a low-cost fast charging station based on a micro gas turbine and a supercapacitor," Energies 15 (21), 8020 (2022). 10.3390/en15218020
  8. E. E. Gieva, I. Ruskova, K. Nedelchev and I. Kralov, " COMSOL numerical investigation of acoustic absorber," in IX National Conference with International Participation (ELECTRONICA) (Sofia, Bulgaria, 2018), (IEEE, 2018), pp. 1-4.
  9. G. D. Todorov and K. H. Kamberov, " Black box/white box hybrid method for virtual prototyping validation of multiphysics simulations and testing," IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 878, 012051 (2020). 10.1088/1757-899X/878/1/012051
  10. G. Wang, " Definition and review of virtual prototyping," Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 2 (3), pp. 232-236 (2002). 10.1115/1.1526508
  11. I. Malakov and V. Zaharinov, " Optimization of size ranges of technical products," Applied Mechanics and Materials 859, pp. 194-203 (2016). 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.859.194

Issue

AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 3339, 2025, Albania, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0297609

Вид: публикация в международен форум, публикация в издание с импакт фактор, публикация в реферирано издание, индексирана в Scopus