Е-Публикации
Технически университет - София

Abstract: Following the Paris Agreement, Bulgaria, alongside the international community, has put efforts into decarbonizing its energy industry, manufacturing, service, and transport. This paper studies possible paths to decarbonize waterborne transport in a developing country – Bulgaria, using a systemic approach. It considers the organization and operation principles of Bulgarian inland and maritime transportation, e.g., the main shipping routes, fleet, available infrastructure, and Bulgarian obligations to the European Union and the International Maritime Organization. We analyzed the energy demands and the preferred alternative energy sources of the local shipping industry based on the available multi-source data. To further widen our perspective, the study considered the Bulgarian energy industry and provided insights into alternative energy sources that are available or can be developed within a reasonable time. The study recommends promising measures to decarbonize Bulgarian waterborne transport – using plug-in batteries and biodiesel for inland shipping, and biodiesel for maritime shipping. The findings and the design of the study are transferable as they can be applied to decarbonizing shipping in developing countries, particularly in Europe.

References

1. E. J. Judd et al., ‘A 485-million-year history of Earth's surface temperature’, Science, vol. 385, no. 6715, p. eadk3705, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1126/science.adk3705.
2. X. Mao, Z. Meng, B. Comer, and T. Decker, ‘Greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution from global shipping, 2016–2023’. Accessed: May 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://theicct.org/publication/greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-air-pollution-from-global-shipping-2016-2023-apr25/.
3. European Commission. Joint Research Centre. and IEA., GHG emissions of all world countries. LU: Publications Office, 2024. Accessed: May 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/4002897.
4. European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency, ‘New CORDIS Results Pack: Waterborne transport for a green future - European Commission’. Accessed: Dec. 27, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/news-events/news/new-cordis-results-pack-waterborne-transport-green-future-2024-06-12_en.
5. Corbett, J.J., Fischbeck, P.S., Pandis, S.N., Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 104:D3 (1999), 3457–3470, 10.1029/1998JD100040.
6. International Maritime Organization, ‘IMO approves net-zero regulations for global shipping’. Accessed: May 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/pages/IMO-approves-netzero-regulations.aspx.
7. PIANC InCom TG 234, ‘Infrastructure for the Decarbonisation of Inland Waterway Transport’, Aug. 2023. Accessed: May 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.pianc.org/publication/infrastructure-for-the-decarbonisation-of-inland-waterway-transport/.
8. Eurostat, ‘Inland waterways transport - Transport - Eurostat’. Dec. 27, 2024. doi: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/transport/information-data/inland-waterways-transport#Data%20releases.
9. Zhelyazkova, D., What is happening to Bulgaria's Maritime transport?. SUV 12:3 (2023), 26–33, 10.56065/IJUSV-ESS/2023.12.3.26.
10. V. Georgiev, A. Asenov, V. Pencheva, and S. Nyagolov, ‘Analysis Of Innovative Hybrid Systems In River Navigation’, Proceedings of the University Of Ruse, vol. 60, no. 4.2, pp. 192–200, 2021.
11. Pencheva, V., Asenov, A., Beloev, I., Georgiev, V., Study of the use of alternative energy sources in inland waterway transport. Transport Problems 14:3 (2019), 109–120, 10.20858/tp.2019.14.3.10.
12. S. Nozharov and P. Koralova - Nozharova, ‘Effects Of The Institutional Environment On The Maritime Transport Development In Bulgaria’, Trakia Journal of Sciences, vol. 20, pp. 11–18, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.15547/tjs.2022.s.01.002.
13. Parvasi, S.P., et al. Analyzing inland waterway competitiveness with electric autonomous RoRo vessels: a case study from Rotterdam to Ghent. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 20, 2025, 101406, 10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101406.
14. Georgiev, P., Garbatov, Y., Carbon emissions statistical analysis for container shipping in the Black Sea. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part m: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 238:2 (2024), 395–405, 10.1177/14750902241228628.
15. Radmilovic, Z., Dragovic, B., The inland navigation in Europe: basic facts, advantages and disadvantages. JMR 4:2 (2007), 31–46.
16. Sønnervik, H.H., Msakni, M.K., Schütz, P., Decarbonizing the norwegian fishery fleet – strategic fleet renewal with environmental considerations. Marit. Transport Res., 7, 2024, 100118, 10.1016/j.martra.2024.100118.
17. The Port of Varna., ‘Port of Varna with best results for 2023’. Accessed: Jan. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.port-varna.bg/contact-form/index.html.
18. N. Antonov, ‘BMF Port Burgas sees 130,000 TEU, 7.2 mln cargo tonnes in 2023’, Ports Europe. Accessed: Jan. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.portseurope.com/private-bmf-port-burgas-handled-130000-teus-and-7-2-mln-tonnes-of-cargo-in-2023/.
19. European Investment Bank, ‘Modern port infrastructure in Varna’, European Investment Bank. Accessed: Jan. 12, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.eib.org/en/projects/all/20210337.
20. MarineTraffic, ‘MarineTraffic: Global Ship Tracking Intelligence | AIS Marine Traffic’. Accessed: Jan. 10, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/ais/home/centerx:29.2/centery:43.1/zoom:8.
21. Eurostat, ‘Sea transport of goods’. Oct. 22, 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.2908/TTR00009.
22. The Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine, ‘Annual report 2023 Inland navigation in Europe. Market observation.’, The Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine, Strasbourg Cedex, France, ISSN 2070-6715, Sep. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ccr-zkr.org/files/documents/om/om23_II_en.pdf.
23. European Alternative Fuels Observatory, ‘Inland waterways’. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://alternative-fuels-observatory.ec.europa.eu/transport-mode/inland-waterways.
24. The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), ‘White paper on efficient and sustainable inland water transport in Europe’, New York and Geneva, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/sc3/publications/WhitePaper_Inland_Water_Transport_2011e.pdf.
25. Danube Commission, ‘Vidin – Danube Commission – Donaukommission – Commission du Danube – Дyнaйcкaя Кoмиccия’. Jan. 13, 2025. Accessed: Jan. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.danubecommission.org/dc/en/danube-navigation/danube-navigation-statistics/ports/vidin/.
26. Kalajdzic, M., Vasilev, M., Momčilović, N., Inland waterway cargo vessel energy efficiency in operation. Brodogradnja 74 (2023), 71–89, 10.21278/brod74304.
27. Dávid, A., Madudová, E., The Danube river and its importance on the Danube countries in cargo transport. Transp. Res. Procedia 40 (Jan. 2019), 1010–1016, 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.141.
28. O. V. Tarovik, A. A. Kondratenko, A. B. Krestyantsev, and A. G. Topaj, ‘Cargo transportation by waterways of Western Siberia: the current status and prospects of development’, Scientific problems of waterborne transport, no. 51, Art. no. 51, 2017.
29. Perčić, M., Vladimir, N., Fan, A., Techno-economic assessment of alternative marine fuels for inland shipping in Croatia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 148, 2021, 111363, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111363.
30. M. Bännstrand, A. Jönsson, H. Von Knorring, and R. Karlsson, Study on the optimization of energy consumption as part of implementation of a ship energy efficiency management plan (SEEMP). 2016.
31. Anne Klein, Denise Hilster, Peter Scholten, Lisanne van Wijngaarden, Eric Tol, and Matthijs Otten, STREAM Freight Transport 2020. Emissions of freight transport modes. Delft: CE Delft, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://cedelft.eu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2021/03/CE_Delft_190325_STREAM_Freight_Transport_2020_FINAL.pdf.
32. Eurostat, ‘Vessels arriving in the main ports by type and size of vessels - quarterly data’. Feb. 12, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.2908/MAR_TF_QM.
33. RINA, ‘Significant Ships - Royal Institution of Naval Architects’. Accessed: Feb. 16, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://rina.org.uk/publications/significant-ships/.
34. Briese Schiffahrt, ‘BRIESE - FLEET’, BRIESE - FLEET. Accessed: Feb. 16, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://briese.de/domains/briese-group/briese-schiffahrt/fleet.
35. Eurostat, ‘Complete energy balances’. Jan. 29, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.2908/NRG_BAL_C.
36. Eurostat, ‘Final energy consumption in transport by type of fuel’. Jan. 29, 2025. doi: 10.2908/ten00126.
37. Bulmarket, ‘Production Of Biodiesel (Astra Bioplant Ltd.)’. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://bulmarket.bg/en/activities/production-of-biodiesel-astra-finance-ad/.
38. Republic of Bulgaria. National Statistical Institute, ‘Energy balances of electricity and heat - Energy supply block’. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.nsi.bg/en/content/20611/energy-balances-electricity-and-heat-energy-supply-block.
39. Kersey, J., Popovich, N.D., Phadke, A.A., Rapid battery cost declines accelerate the prospects of all-electric interregional container shipping. Nat Energy 7:7 (2022), 664–674, 10.1038/s41560-022-01065-y.
40. Kondratenko, A.A., Zhang, M., Tavakoli, S., Altarriba, E., Hirdaris, S., Existing technologies and scientific advancements to decarbonize shipping by retrofitting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 212, 2025, 115430, 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115430.
41. Morwenna Shipping Company, ‘OT-2452 Pusher Tug’. 2025. Accessed: Feb. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mwship.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/201030.Morwenna.Booklet.OT2452_A4_ENG.pdf.
42. Kistner, L., Bensmann, A., Hanke-Rauschenbach, R., Potentials and limitations of battery-electric container ship propulsion systems. Energy Convers. Manage.: X, 21, Jan. 2024, 100507, 10.1016/j.ecmx.2023.100507.
43. Moon, H.S., Park, W.Y., Hendrickson, T., Phadke, A., Popovich, N., Exploring the cost and emissions impacts, feasibility and scalability of battery electric ships. Nat Energy 10:1 (Jan. 2025), 41–54, 10.1038/s41560-024-01655-y.
44. A. D. Papanikolaou, ‘Review of the Design and Technology Challenges of Zero-Emission, Battery-Driven Fast Marine Vehicles’, Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 11, Art. no. 11, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.3390/jmse8110941.
45. Karimi, S., Zadeh, M., Suul, J.A., Shore Charging for plug-in battery-powered ships: power system architecture, infrastructure, and control. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 8:3 (2020), 47–61, 10.1109/MELE.2020.3005699.
46. European Union, ‘Document 52017SC0365 Detailed Assessment of the National Policy Frameworks’. Nov. 08, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52017SC0365.
47. T. Teske, A. Fitz, T. Schwedt, L. Baetcke, and S. Ehlers, ‘Electrifying inland waterway transport – a case study for Germany’, Ship Technology Research, pp. 1–14, doi: 10.1080/09377255.2025.2469396.

Issue