Autors: Stanchev, P. A., Hinov, N. L.
Title: Comparative Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment of Stationary Energy Storage Systems: Lithium-Ion, Lead-Acid, and Hydrogen
Keywords: battery, energy efficiency, fuel cells, life cycle, sustainable energy

Abstract: This study presents a comparative techno-economic and environmental assessment of three leading stationary energy storage technologies: lithium-ion batteries, lead-acid batteries, and hydrogen systems (electrolyzer–tank–fuel cell). The analysis integrates Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) to provide a holistic evaluation. The LCA covers the full cradle-to-grave stages, while LCOS accounts for capital and operational expenditures, efficiency, and cycling frequency. The results indicate that lithium-ion batteries achieve the lowest LCOS (120–180 EUR/MWh) and high round-trip efficiency (90–95%), making them optimal for short- and medium-duration storage. Lead-acid batteries, though characterized by low capital expenditures (CAPEX) and high recyclability (>95%), show limited cycle life and lower efficiency (75–80%). Hydrogen systems remain costly (>250 EUR/MWh) and less efficient (30–40%), yet they demonstrate clear advantages for long-term and seasonal storage, particularly under scenarios with “green” hydrogen production and reduced CAPEX. These findings provide practical guidance for policymakers, investors, and industry stakeholders in selecting appropriate storage solutions aligned with decarbonization and sustainability goals.

References

  1. Zakeri B. Syri S. Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014 42 569 596 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.011
  2. Schmidt O. Melchior S. Hawkes A. Staffell I. Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies Joule 2019 3 81 100 10.1016/j.joule.2018.12.008
  3. Ziegler M.S. Mueller J.M. Pereira G.D. Song J. Ferrara M. Chiang Y. Trancik J.E. Storage requirements and costs of shaping renewable energy toward grid decarbonization Joule 2019 3 2134 2153 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.012
  4. Pellow M.A. Emmott C.J.M. Barnhart C.J. Benson S.M. Hydrogen or batteries for grid storage? A Net Energy analysis Energy Environ. Sci. 2015 8 1938 1952 10.1039/c4ee04041d
  5. Hiremath M. Derendorf K. Vogt T. Comparative Life cycle assessment of battery storage systems for stationary applications Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015 49 4825 4833 10.1021/es504572q
  6. Notter D.A. Gauch M. Widmer R. Wäger P. Stamp A. Zah R. Althaus H.-J. Contribution of Li-Ion Batteries to the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010 44 6550 6556 10.1021/es903729a 41078836
  7. Ellingsen L.A. Majeau-Bettez G. Singh B. Srivastava A.K. Valøen L.O. Strømman A.H. Life cycle assessment of a Lithium-Ion battery vehicle pack J. Ind. Ecol. 2013 18 113 124 10.1111/jiec.12072
  8. Peters J.F. Baumann M. Zimmermann B. Braun J. Weil M. The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters—A review Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016 67 491 506 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039
  9. Dunn J.B. Gaines L. Kelly J.C. James C. Gallagher K.G. The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling’s role in its reduction Energy Environ. Sci. 2014 8 158 168 10.1039/C4EE03029J
  10. Hao H. Mu Z. Jiang S. Liu Z. Zhao F. GHG Emissions from the Production of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles in China Sustainability 2017 9 504 10.3390/su9040504
  11. Dai Q. Kelly J.C. Gaines L. Wang M. Life cycle analysis of Lithium-Ion batteries for automotive applications Batteries 2019 5 48 10.3390/batteries5020048
  12. Majeau-Bettez G. Hawkins T.R. Strømman A.H. Life cycle environmental assessment of Lithium-Ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for Plug-In Hybrid and Battery Electric vehicles Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011 45 5454 10.1021/es2015082
  13. Porzio J. Scown C.D. Life-Cycle Assessment considerations for batteries and battery materials Adv. Energy Mater. 2021 11 2100771 10.1002/aenm.202100771
  14. Llamas-Orozco J.A. Meng F. Walker G.S. Abdul-Manan A.F.N. MacLean H.L. Posen I.D. McKechnie J. Estimating the environmental impacts of global lithium-ion battery supply chain: A temporal, geographical, and technological perspective PNAS Nexus 2023 2 pgad361 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad361 38034093
  15. Gutsch M. Leker J. Costs, carbon footprint and environmental impacts of lithium-ion battery materials and recycling Appl. Energy 2024 360 122700 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122132
  16. Kobayashi T. Kondo H. Sasaki T. Life cycle assessment integrating the effects of recycling and reuse for battery circulation J. Power Sources 2024 624 235544 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235544
  17. Paul D. Pechancová V. Saha N. Pavelková D. Saha N. Motiei M. Jamatia T. Chaudhuri M. Ivanichenko A. Venher M. et al. Life-cycle assessment of lithium-based batteries: Review of sustainability dimensions Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024 206 113171 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114860
  18. Rydh C.J. Environmental assessment of vanadium redox and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage J. Power Sources 1999 80 21 29 10.1016/S0378-7753(98)00249-3
  19. Ma Y. Yu S. Wang J. Yu W. LCA/LCC analysis of starting-lighting-ignition lead-acid battery in China PeerJ 2018 6 e5238 10.7717/peerj.5238
  20. Sridevi J. Ananthi S. Gokilavani R. Al-Farouni M. Abdul Ameer S. Life Cycle Assessment of Battery Energy Storage Technologies for Vehicular Applications E3S Web Conf. 2024 564 08004 10.1051/e3sconf/202456408004
  21. Bhandari R. Trudewind C.A. Zapp P. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production via electrolysis—A review J. Clean. Prod. 2013 85 151 163 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.048
  22. Osman A.I. Nasr M. Mohamed A.R. Abdelhaleem A. Ayati A. Farghali M. Al-Muhtaseb A.H. Al-Fatesh A.S. Rooney D.W. Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production, storage, and utilization toward sustainability Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 2024 13 e526 10.1002/wene.526
  23. Puig-Samper G. Bargiacchi E. Iribarren D. Dufour J. Life-cycle assessment of hydrogen systems: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis J. Clean. Prod. 2024 470 143330 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143330
  24. De León C.M. Ríos C. Molina P. Brey J. Levelized Cost of Storage (LCOS) for a hydrogen system Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2023 52 1274 1284 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.239
  25. Wu D. Wang D. Ramachandran T. Holladay J. A techno-economic assessment framework for hydrogen energy storage toward multiple energy delivery pathways and grid services Energy 2022 249 123638 10.1016/j.energy.2022.123638
  26. International Energy Agency (IEA) Global Hydrogen Review 2023 IEA Paris, France 2023 Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-hydrogen-review-2023 (accessed on 6 September 2025)
  27. Reznicek E.P. Koleva M.N. King J. Kotarbinski M. Grant E. Vijayshankar S. Brunik K. Thomas J. Gupta A. Hammond S. et al. Techno-economic analysis of low-carbon hydrogen production pathways for decarbonizing steel and ammonia production Cell Rep. Sustain. 2025 2 100338 10.1016/j.crsus.2025.100338
  28. Todorov G. Kamberov K. Todorov T. Thermodynamic Analysis and Optimization of a Regenerative Heat Exchange System for Solid Oxide Electrolyzer-Based Hydrogen Production Energies 2025 18 4424 10.3390/en18164424
  29. Todorov G. Kralov I. Koprev I. Vasilev H. Naydenova I. Coal Share Reduction Options for Power Generation during the Energy Transition: A Bulgarian Perspective Energies 2024 17 929 10.3390/en17040929
  30. ISO 14040:2006 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland 2006
  31. ISO 14044:2006 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines International Organization for Standardization Geneva, Switzerland 2006

Issue

Batteries, vol. 11, 2025, Switzerland, https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries11100382

Copyright MDPI

Цитирания (Citation/s):
1. Rifadil M.M., Putra P.A.M., Muklis A., Design of an EBNN-PID based adaptive charge controller for variable DC charging applications, 2025, International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, issue 4, vol. 16, pp. 2634-2644, DOI 10.11591/ijpeds.v16.i4.pp2634-2644, issn 20888694 - 2025 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus
2. Hristov A.V., Gotseva D., Trifonov R.I., Petrovic J., Development of an IoT System for Acquisition of Data and Control Based on External Battery State of Charge, 2026, Electronics Switzerland, issue 3, vol. 15, DOI 10.3390/electronics15030502, eissn 20799292 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
3. Santos T.J.C., Farinha J.M.T., Mendes M., Monteiro J., Thermal Energy Storage in Renewable Energy Communities: A State-of-the-Art Review, 2026, Energies, issue 5, vol. 19, DOI 10.3390/en19051363, eissn 19961073 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
4. Jasper F.B., Zhou Y., Ersoy H., Baumann M.J., Peters J., Neuhaus D.H., Weil M., Life cycle assessment of grid-scale battery storage: evaluating the environmental competitiveness of sodium-ion systems, 2026, Energy Advances, issue 0, DOI 10.1039/d5ya00341e, eissn 27531457 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
5. Himona, E, Poullikkas, A, Beyond the Grid: Modeling, Optimization and Economic Evaluation of Future Hydrogen Autonomous Home Energy Systems, ENERGIES, vol 19, 2026, eissn: 1996-1073, art_no: ARTN 1527, doi: 10.3390/en19061527 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
6. Xu R., Huang X., Xie L., Jin G., Solid gravitational energy storage technology: A comprehensive review of current status, development trends, and application prospects in desert regions, 2026, Journal of Energy Storage, issue 0, vol. 163, DOI 10.1016/j.est.2026.122057, eissn 2352152X - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
7. Chintaluri K.K., Islam M.M., Singh J.G., A Review of Sustainable Pathways for the Second-Life Batteries from Electric Vehicles, 2026, 4th IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics and Iot Applications in Renewable Energy and Its Control Parc 2026, issue 0, pp. 130-137, DOI 10.1109/PARC68365.2026.11453663 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus
8. Denter N.M., Chu J., Huber M., Baldauf T., Modelling battery waste heat recovery for sector-coupled power-heat systems in district heating planning, 2026, Smart Energy, issue 0, vol. 22, DOI 10.1016/j.segy.2026.100248, eissn 26669552 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
9. Tafur-Escanta, P, Garzón-Pérez, L, Barrera-Cifuentes, L, Coco-Enriquez, L, Valencia-Chapi, R, Performance Evaluation of sCO2-Hydrocarbon Mixtures in SBC-PTES Systems: A Parametric Thermo-Economic Study, APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, vol 16, 2026, eissn: 2076-3417, art_no: ARTN 4068, doi: 10.3390/app16094068 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
10. Stanchev, P, Hinov, N, Second-Life EV Batteries in Stationary Storage: Techno-Economic and Environmental Benchmarking vs. Pb-Acid and H2, ENERGIES, vol 19, 2026, eissn: 1996-1073, art_no: ARTN 2026, doi: 10.3390/en19092026 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
11. Bin Nadeem, T, Asif, M, Suberi, HK, Prospects of renewable energy and low carbon energy systems in Pakistan: Policy recommendations for sustainable solution to energy crisis, AIP ADVANCES, vol 16, 2026, eissn: 2158-3226, art_no: ARTN 050701, doi: 10.1063/5.0274281 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
12. Zhu Z.J., Espinosa N., Jordaan S.M., Life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic–battery systems: A Canadian case study, 2026, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, issue 0, vol. 90, DOI 10.1016/j.seta.2026.105017, issn 22131388 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
13. Algrafy E., Ghobashy M.M., Baata M., Almoiqli M.S., Siddiq A., Madani M., Algethami F.K., Attia M.S., Two-dimensional material electrodes for next-generation energy storage synthesis, characterization, and applications, 2026, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, issue 0, vol. 1072, DOI 10.1016/j.jallcom.2026.188840, issn 09258388 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
14. González-Briones, A, Flórez, SL, Alvarez-López, C, Ramos, C, González, SR, Enhancing Energy Efficiency and Economic Benefits with Battery Energy Storage Systems: An Agent-Based Optimization Approach, ELECTRONICS, vol 15, 2026, issn: 2079-9292, art_no: ARTN 2269, doi: 10.3390/electronics15112269 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
15. Bai, YZ, Rong, CR, Li, Y, Zhang, R, Wang, XG, Wang, L, Zhang, HC, Wang, N, Ding, F, Early Warning of Lithium-Ion Battery Capacity Roll-Over Using Capacity Fade Knee Point Detected by Impedance Influence Factor, ENERGY & FUELS, 2026, issn: 0887-0624, eissn: 1520-5029, doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6c01621 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus и/или Web of Science
16. Ohajianya A.C., Ezihe J.A., Nwaneho F.U., Ouserigha E.C., Echewodo J.C., Ugbaja C.M., Techno-economic comparison of lead-acid and lithium-ion batteries in residential PV systems: A multi-location study of Abuja, Beijing, and Washington DC, 2026, Journal of Asian Energy Studies, issue 0, vol. 10, pp. 36-58, DOI 10.24112/jaes.100003, eissn 25241222 - 2026 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus

Вид: статия в списание, публикация в издание с импакт фактор, публикация в реферирано издание, индексирана в Scopus и Web of Science