Autors: Stefanov S., Ivanova, M. S.
Title: Evaluation of Software System Based on Methodology Digital Forensics Investigation from Practical Point of View DFIP
Keywords: Computer expertise, DFIP methodology, Digital forensic investigation, Digital forensics, Software system

Abstract: 2025.The advent of new technologies leads to a complexity of the cybercrime landscape and scenes, which requires an adequate response from digital forensic investigators. To support their forensic activities, a number of models and methodologies have been developed, such as the methodology Digital Forensics Investigation from Practical Point of View DFIP, proposed by us in a previous work. In addition, there is an urgent need for a virtual environment that would organize and manage the activities of investigators related to communication, document exchange, preparation of computer expertise, teamwork, information delivery and training. In this context, a software system implementing the DFIP methodology has been developed, and the aim of the paper is to present the results of a study regarding the opinion and attitudes of forensic experts on the usefulness and role of the software system during the different phases of digital forensic investigation.

References

  1. Abbas TMJ, Abdulmajeed AS (2021) Identifying digital forensic frameworks based on processes models. Iraqi J Sci 249–258. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2021.SI.1.35
  2. Alenezi AM (2023) Digital and cloud forensic challenges. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305. 03059
  3. Dubey H, Bhatt S, Negi L (2023) Digital forensics techniques and trends: a review. Int Arab J Inf Technol (IAJIT) 20(4):644–654. https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/20/4/11
  4. Fakhouri HN, AlSharaiah MA, Al Hwaitat AK, Alkalaileh M, Dweikat FF (2024) Overview of challenges faced by digital forensic. In: 2024 2nd International conference on cyber resilience (ICCR), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCR61006.2024.105 32850
  5. Klasen L, Fock N, Forchheimer R (2024) The invisible evidence: digital forensics as key to solving crimes in the digital age. Forensic Sci Int 362(112133):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint. 2024.112133
  6. Li Y, Liu Q (2021) A comprehensive review study of cyber-attacks and cyber security; emerging trends and recent developments. Energy Rep 7:8176–8186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021. 08.126
  7. Noland A (2024) Current challenges of digital forensics. Themis Res J Justice Stud Forensic Sci 12(1):Article 1. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol12/iss1/1
  8. Phillips K, Davidson JC, Farr RR, Burkhardt C, Caneppele S, Aiken MP (2022) Conceptualizing Cybercrime: Definitions, Typologies and Taxonomies. Forensic Sci 2(2):379–398. https://doi. org/10.3390/forensicsci2020028
  9. Stefanov S, Ivanova M (2024) An architecture for realization of methodology digital forensics investigation from practical point of view DFIP: a requirement analysis. In: 9th International congress on information and communication technology, ICICT 2024, vol 1013. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, London, pp 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-3559-4_ 35
  10. Vala JB, Vekariya VM (2024) The role and importance of digital forensics and digital evidence in cyber crime detection. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res 13(6):413–420. https://doi.org/10. 69605/ijlbpr_13.6.2024.80

Issue

Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol. 1444 LNNS, pp. 571-581, 2025, Singapore, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6932-5_44

Copyright Springer, Singapore

Вид: книга/глава(и) от книга, публикация в издание с импакт фактор, публикация в реферирано издание, индексирана в Scopus