Е-Публикации
Технически университет - София

Abstract: This work has the purpose to elucidate in deeper detail the conjugated physical phenomena at the interface between two immiscible fluids in microfluidic devices. The two typical regimes—dripping and jetting—emerging in flow-focusing devices are considered for the analysis. Dynamic (time-dependent analysis of fixed or Lagrangian-tracked points) and local (lines along the interface, at a fixed time instance) analyses have been conducted from a parallel numerical simulation on a fine numerical grid. The results comprise various pressures and tangential stresses and their balance during the droplet formation process with special attention paid to the moments and locations of the droplet release. It was found that the dripping regime is characterized by the local balance of the pressure drop due to surface tension Δpσand the Laplace pressure ΔpLapl across the interface. Only at the last moments before the droplet pinch-off does the former pressure dominate. In contrast, in the jetting regime, there is a clear domination of the pressure due to tension during the whole process of droplet formation. Shear stresses, presented by the von Mises criterion, are several times (jetting regime) or even an order of magnitude (dripping regime) lower than the surface tension pressure and the Laplace pressure. In both regimes, when the interface curvature κ changes locally its sign, the pressure at the centerline axis shows a clear local maximum. For the jetting regime, the downstream derivative of this centerline pressure is the first parameter that changes along the jet axis—thus indicating the onset of instabilities for this regime—and it is then followed by a wavelike change of the radius of the jet.

References

1. N. Nguyen S. Wereley Fundamentals and Applications of Microfluidics 2007 Norwood, MA, USA ArtechHouse Publishing
2. Kirov, B.: Development and application of microfluidics in synthetic biology. In: Singh, V. (ed.) Advances in Synthetic Biology, pp. 321–335. Springer, Singapore (2020)
3. Tabeling, P.: Introduction to Microfluidics Oxford University Press, 301 p. (2006)
4. N. Lang J. Zhuangde W. Xueyong Emerging microfluidic devices for cell lysis: a review Lab Chip 2014 1060–1073 6 10.1039/C3LC51133B
5. E. Grigorov S. Peykov B. Kirov Novel microfluidics device for rapid antibiotics susceptibility screening Appl. Sci. 2022 12 2198 10.3390/app12042198
6. C.D. Ahrberg A. Manz B.G. Chung Polymerase chain reaction in microfluidic devices Lab Chip 2016 16 20 3866 3884 10.1039/C6LC00984K
7. C. Cramer P. Fischer E. Windhab Drop formation in a co-flowing ambient fluid Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004 59 15 3045 3058 10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.006
8. Lord Rayleigh, On the stability of a cylinder of viscous liquid under capillary force, Scientific Papers (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,) 34(5), 145–154 (1892). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511703980.055
9. M.L. Cordero F. Gallaire C.N. Baroud Quantitative analysis of the dripping and jetting regimes in co-flowing capillary jets Phys. Fluids 2011 23 9 10.1063/1.3634044
10. A.L.R. Costa A. Gomes R.L. Cunha Studies of droplets formation regime and actual flow rate of liquid-liquid flows in flow-focusing microfluidic devices Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 2017 85 167 175 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.03.003
11. N.M. Kovalchuk M. Sagisaka K. Steponavicius Drop formation in microfluidic cross-junction: jetting to dripping to jetting transition Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2019 23 103 10.1007/s10404-019-2269-z
12. Utada, A.S., lorenceau, E., Link, D.R., Kaplan, P.D., Stone, H.A., Weitz, D.A.: Monodisperse double emulsions generated from a microcapilllary device. Science, 308(5721), 537–41 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1109164
13. Powers TR., Zhang D., Goldstein RE., Stone H.: Propagation of a topological transition: the Rayleigh instability. Phys. Fluids, 10(5):1052–1057 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869650
14. X. Chen T. Glawdel N. Cui C.L. Ren Model of droplet generation in flow focusing generators operating in the squeezing regime Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2014 18 5–6 1341 1353 10.1007/s10404-014-1533-5
15. Svetlov, S. D., Abiev, R. S.: Mathematical modeling of the droplet formation process in a microfluidic device. Chem. Eng. Sci., 235, 116493 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.116493
16. Gu, Z.P., Liow, J.L., A Force balance model for the size prediction of droplets formed at T-junction with xanthan gum solutions. In: 18th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (2012)
17. M.L.J. Steegmans J. De Ruiter K.G.P.H. Schroën R.M. Boom A descriptive force-balance model for droplet formation at microfluidic Y-junctions AIChE J. 2010 56 10 2641 2649 10.1002/aic.12176
18. P. Wu Z. Luo Z. Liu Z. Li C. Chen L. Feng L. He Drag-induced breakup mechanism for droplet generation in dripping within flow focusing microfluidics Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2015 23 1 7 14 10.1016/j.cjche.2014.09.043
19. M. Nekouei S.A. Vanapalli Volume-of-fluid simulations in microfluidic T-junction devices: influence of viscosity ratio on droplet size Phys. Fluids 2017 29 3 10.1063/1.4978801
20. Sontti, S. G., Atta, A.: Numerical insights on controlled droplet formation in a microfluidic flow-focusing device. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 59, 9, 3702–3716 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02137
21. S.K.A. Rahimia P. Rezaib Effect of device geometry on droplet size in co-axial flow-focusing microfluidic droplet generation devices Colloids Surf. A 2019 570 510 517 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.03.067
22. Grigorov, E., Denev, J.A., Kirov, B., Galabov, V., Parameters influencing the droplet formation in a flow-focusing microfluidic channel. In: E3S Web of Conferences, 327, 05002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202132705002
23. Han, W., Chen, X., Wu, Z., Zheng, Y.: Three-dimensional numerical simulation of droplet formation in a microfluidic flow-focusing device. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41(6) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1767-y
24. S.G. Sontti A. Atta Regulation of droplet size and flow regime by geometrical confinement in a microfluidic flow-focusing device Phys. Fluids 2023 35 1 10.1063/5.0130834
25. F. Shen M. Ai Z. Li Pressure measurement methods in microchannels: advances and applications Microfluid. Nanofluid. 2021 25 39 10.1007/s10404-021-02435-w
26. ANSYS Fluent User's Guide, 2021R1, Section 16.3 (2023)
27. Yao, C., Liu, Y., Xu, C., Zhao, S., Chen, G.: Formation of liquid–liquid slug flow in a microfluidic T-junction: effects of fluid properties and leakage flow AIChE J., 64, 346 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.15889
28. L. Wu M. Tsutahara L.S. Kim M. Ha Three-dimensional lattice Boltzmann simulations of droplet formation in a cross-junction microchannel Int J. Multiphase Flow 2008 34 852 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.02.009
29. Schießl R., Denev, J.A.: DNS-studies on flame front markers for turbulent premixed combustion. Combust. Theory Modell. 24(6), 983–1001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/13647830.2020.1800102
30. Zierep, J., Bühler, K.: Grundzüge der Strömungslehre 11 edn., 224 p., Springer Vieweg (2016)
31. White, F.: Fluid Mechanics. 866 p., Fifth edition. McGraw Hill (2003)
32. Gennes, P., Brochard-Wyart, F. Quere, D.: Capillarity and Wetting Phenomena. pp. 7–8., Springer (2004)
33. J. Eggers E. Villermaux Physics of liquid jets Rep. Prog. Phys. 2008 71 10.1088/0034-4885/71/3/036601
34. Rapp, B.: Microfluidics: Modeling, Mechanics and Mathematics, Elsevier, 800 p., 1 Edition (2016)

Issue