Е-Публикации
Технически университет - София

Abstract: Testing and visual inspection of printed circuit boards (PCBs) and printed circuit board assemblies (PCBAs) are important procedures in the manufacturing process of electronic modules and devices related to locating and identifying possible defects and failures. Earlier defects detection leads to decreasing expenses, time and used resources to produce high quality electronics. In this paper an exploration and analysis about the current research regarding methods for PCB and PCBA testing, techniques for defects detection and vusial inspection is performed. The impact of machine and deep learning for testing and visual inspection procedures is also investigated. The used methodology comprises bibliometric approach and content analysis of papers, indexed in scientific database Scopus, considering the queries: “PCB and testing” and “PCB and testing”, “printed circuit board assembly and testing” and “PCBA and testing”, “PCB defect detection” and “PCBA defect detection”, “PCB and visual inspection”, and “PCBA and visual inspection”. The findings are presented in the form of a framework, which summarizes the contemporary landscape of methods for PCBs and PCBAs testing and visual inspection.

References

1. Á. M. Sampaio et al., “Design and development of an automatic optical inspection (AOI) system support based on digital manufacturing,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 119, pp. 15–20, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2023.03.080.
2. A. A. Dzyubanenko and G. I. Korshunov, “Quality control in cyber-physical systems of smart electronics manufacturing,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 2094, no. 4, p. 042066, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2094/4/042066.
3. T. Parakontan and W. Sawangsri, “Development of the machine vision system for automated inspection of printed circuit board assembl,” in Proceedings of 2019 3rd IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Sciences, IEEE, Jun. 2019, pp. 244–248, doi: 10.1109/ICRAS.2019.8808980.
4. R. Gupta, “Failure mode and effects analysis of PCB for quality control process,” Mapan-Journal of Metrology Society of India, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 547–556, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12647-022-00619-5.
5. J. Li, “Application of statistical process control in engineering quality management,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 831, no. 1, p. 012073, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/831/1/012073.
6. J. He, Y. Cen, S. Alelaumi, and D. Won, “An artificial intelligence-based pick-and-place process control for quality enhancement in surface mount technology,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1702–1711, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCPMT.2022.3215109.
7. M. Mirzaei, M. H. Sadat, and F. Naderkhani, “Application of machine learning for anomaly detection in printed circuit boards imbalance date set,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, IEEE, Jun. 2023, pp. 128– 133, doi: 10.1109/ICPHM57936.2023.10193957.
8. A. Bhattacharya and S. G. Cloutier, “End-to-end deep learning framework for printed circuit board manufacturing defect classification,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 12559, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16302-3.
9. D. Kim, J. Koo, H. Kim, S. Kang, S. H. Lee, and J. T. Kang, “Rapid fault cause identification in surface mount technology processes based on factory-wide data analysis,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 155014771983280, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1177/1550147719832802.
10. I. Parviziomran, S. Cao, H. Yang, S. Park, and D. Won, “Data-driven prediction model of components shift during reflow process in surface mount technology,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 38, pp. 100–107, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.014.
11. C. Houdek, Caltronics Design and Assembly, Inc. [Available Online]: http://www.claire-e-cunningham.com/uploads/8/0/4/5/8045165/inspection-and-testing-methods-for-pcbs-an-overview.pdf.
12. P. Chen and F. Xie, “A Machine learning approach for automated detection of critical PCB flaws in optical sensing systems,” Photonics, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 984, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/photonics10090984.
13. B. Bártová and V. Bína, “A novel data mining approach for defect detection in the printed circuit board manufacturing process,” Engineering Management in Production and Services, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 13–25, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.2478/emj-2022-0013.
14. M. Kumar and M. Kumar, “A survey on various approaches of automatic optical inspection for PCB defect detection,” International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 837–841, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.26438/ijcse/v7i6.837841.
15. M. Jafir et al., “The global trend of nanomaterial usage to control the important agricultural arthropod pests: A comprehensive review,” Plant Stress, vol. 10, p. 100208, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100208.
16. A. Dirpan et al., “Trends over the last 25 years and future research into smart packaging for food: A review,” Future Foods, vol. 8, p. 100252, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.fufo.2023.100252.
17. M. J. Akhtar, M. Azhar, N. A. Khan, and M. N. Rahman, “Conceptualizing social media analytics in digital economy: An evidence from bibliometric analysis,” Journal of Digital Economy, vol. 2, pp. 1–15, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jdec.2023.03.004.
18. D. Lee, “Bibliometric analysis of Asian ‘language and linguistics’ research: a case of 13 countries,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 379, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01840-6.
19. M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” Journal of Informetrics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 959–975, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
20. A. Azin, A. Zhukov, A. Narikovich, S. Ponomarev, S. Rikkonen, and V. Leitsin, “Nondestructive testing method for a new generation of electronics,” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 143, p. 04007, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201814304007.
21. J. Elliot and J. Brown, “An Investigation into the failure characteristics of external PCB traces with different angle bends,” Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 103–110, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10836-023-06043-0.
22. A. Wileman, S. Perinpanayagam, and S. Aslam, “Physics of failure (PoF) based lifetime prediction of power electronics at the printed circuit board level,” Applied Sciences (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 6, p. 2679, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11062679.
23. L. Li et al., “An interdigital electrode probe for detection, localization and evaluation of surface notch-type damage in metals,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 18, no. 2, p. 371, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18020371.
24. R. Oliveira et al., “A systematic analysis of printed circuit boards bending during in-circuit tests,” Machines, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 135, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/machines10020135.
25. I. Volkau, M. Abdul, W. Dai, M. Erdt, and A. Sourin, “Detection defect in printed circuit boards using unsupervised feature extraction upon transfer learning,” in Proceedings-2019 International Conference on Cyberworlds, IEEE, Oct. 2019, pp. 101– 108, doi: 10.1109/CW.2019.00025.
26. V. T. Nguyen and H. A. Bui, “A real-time defect detection in printed circuit boards applying deep learning,” EUREKA, Physics, and Engineering, vol. 2022, no. 2, pp. 143–153, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.21303/2461-4262.2022.002127.
27. L. H. D. S. Silva, G. O. D. A. Azevedo, B. J. T. Fernandes, B. L. D. Bezerra, E. B. Lima, and S. C. Oliveira, “Automatic optical inspection for defective PCB detection using transfer learning,” in 2019 IEEE Latin American Conference on Computational Intelligence, IEEE, Nov. 2019, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/LA-CCI47412.2019.9037036.
28. N. E. B. Alaoui, P. Tounsi, A. Boyer, and A. Viard, “Detecting PCB assembly defects using infrared thermal signatures,” 26th International Conference “Mixed Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems,” IEEE, Jun. 2019, pp. 345–349, doi: 10.23919/MIXDES.2019.8787089.
29. T. Qiu, C. K. Andrew Tek, and S. Y. Huang, “A compact high-resolution resonance-based capacitive sensor for defects detection on PCBAs,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 203758–203768, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036884.
30. N. E. B. Alaoui, P. Tounsi, A. Boyer, and A. Viard, “New testing approach using near electromagnetic field probing intending to upgrade in-circuit testing of high density PCBAs,” in 27th North Atlantic Test Workshop, IEEE, May 2018, pp. 1–8, doi: 10.1109/NATW.2018.8388867.
31. J. Liu et al., “A Novel Non-destructive Failure Location method for electronic components based on TDR technology,” in 2022 23rd International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, IEEE, Aug. 2022, pp. 1–3, doi: 10.1109/ICEPT56209.2022.9873325.
32. V. Tsenev, V. Videkov, and N. Spasova, “Measurement of PCBA (Printed circuit board assembly) deformation during functional testing of electronic modules,” in 2021 35th International Conference on Information Technologies, IEEE, Sep. 2021, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/InfoTech52438.2021.9548409.
33. T. Wanchun, X. Hui, and L. Chaohui, “Application of strain test technology in PCBA process,” in 2020 21st International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, IEEE, Aug. 2020, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/ICEPT50128.2020.9202988.
34. J. M. Runji and C. Y. Lin, “Markerless cooperative augmented reality-based smart manufacturing double-check system: Case of safe PCBA inspection following automatic optical inspection,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 64, p. 101957, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101957.
35. L. Bonaria, M. Raganato, G. Squillero, and M. S. Reorda, “Test-plan optimization for flying-probes in-circuit testers,” in Proceedings-2019 IEEE International Test Conference in Asia, IEEE, Sep. 2019, pp. 19–24, doi: 10.1109/ITC-Asia.2019.00017.
36. H. N. Le, T. V. Nguyen, and N. C. Debnath, “A machine vision based automatic optical inspection system for detecting defects of PCBA,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 2020, pp. 480–489, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-44289-7_45.
37. J. H. Park, Y. S. Kim, H. Seo, and Y. J. Cho, “Analysis of training deep learning models for PCB defect detection,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 2766, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23052766.
38. H. Wang, J. Xie, X. Xu, and Z. Zheng, “Few-shot PCB surface defect detection based on feature enhancement and multi-scale fusion,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 129911–129924, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3228392.
39. Y. Yang and H. Kang, “An enhanced detection method of PCB defect based on improved YOLOv7,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 9, p. 2120, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12092120.
40. I. C. Chen, R. C. Hwang, and H. C. Huang, “PCB defect detection based on deep learning algorithm,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 775, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/pr11030775.
41. Z. Li, J. Yan, J. Zhou, X. Fan, and J. Tang, “An efficient SMD-PCBA detection based on YOLOv7 network model,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 124, p. 106492, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106492.
42. M. Jeon, S. Yoo, and S. W. Kim, “A contactless PCBA defect detection method: convolutional neural networks with thermographic images,” IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 489– 501, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TCPMT.2022.3147319.
43. S. Deng et al., “EEDD: edge-guided energy-based PCB defect detection,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 10, p. 2306, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12102306.
44. S. S. Zakaria, A. Amir, N. Yaakob, and S. Nazemi, “Automated detection of printed circuit boards (PCB) defects by using machine learning in electronic manufacturing: current approaches,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 767, no. 1, p. 012064, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/767/1/012064.
45. X. Cao, “A real-time automated visual inspection system for printed circuit boards missing footprints detection,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 350–358, 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.0140537.
46. B. P. Iglesias, M. Otani, and F. G. Oliveira, “Glue level estimation through automatic visual inspection in PCB manufacturing,” in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications, 2021, pp. 731–738, doi: 10.5220/0010540807310738.
47. K. Zhang, “Using deep learning to automatic inspection system of printed circuit board in manufacturing industry under the internet of things,” Computer Science and Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 723–741, 2023, doi: 10.2298/CSIS220718020Z.
48. M. A. M. Sathiaseelan, O. P. Paradis, S. Taheri, and N. Asadizanjani, “Why is deep learning challenging for printed circuit board (PCB) component recognition and how can we address it?,” Cryptography, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 9, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3390/cryptography5010009.
49. V. A. Adibhatla et al., “Unsupervised anomaly detection in printed circuit boards through student–teacher feature pyramid matching,” Electronics (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 24, p. 3177, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10243177.
50. O. Y. Chiun and N. I. R. Ruhaiyem, “Object detection based automated optical inspection of printed circuit board assembly using deep learning,” in Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2023, pp. 246–258, doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-0405-1_18.
51. B. Malin, T. Kalganova, J. Danskins, and J. R. Gilchrist, “PCBA image analysis: a comparison of visible, infrared and x-ray wavelengths,” in 2022 IEEE Physical Assurance and Inspection of Electronics, IEEE, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/PAINE56030.2022.10014963.

Issue

Copyright IAES