Е-Публикации
Технически университет - София

Abstract: The choice of the most appropriate sustainable scheme for the organization of tram transportation in cities is of great importance for tram operators, for users of transportation services, and for the protection of the environment from harmful emissions. This study aims to propose a methodology for formulating a tram transportation plan considering technological, environmental, economic, and social indicators. The variant schemes represent the routes of a tram in the tram network. The methodology includes four stages. The first stage involves the determination of variant schemes for a transportation plan of service with trams. In the second stage, a two-step optimization model is proposed to determine the number and trams by types for each tram route for each variant scheme, and also to establish the distribution of trams by depots. The third stage includes ranking the variant schemes by applying the sequential interactive model for urban systems (SIMUS) multi-criteria method. Eleven quantitative and qualitative criteria for evaluating the tram transportation plan were introduced. A verification of the results is performed in the fourth stage. For this purpose, a comparison of the preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE) method and the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method is made. Both methods have different approaches for decision making and differ from the SIMUS method. Two strategies were proposed to determine the criteria weights. One is based on the Shannon entropy method and the other uses the objective weights obtained through the SIMUS method. Finally, in the fifth stage, the results obtained through the SIMUS, PROMEHEE and TOPSIS methods are combined using the expected value obtained by applying the program evaluation and review technique method (PERT). The proposed methodology was applied to study tram transportation in Sofia, Bulgaria. Five variant schemes were considered. The schemes are optimized through the criterion of minimum energy consumption. The number of trams by routes and by type was determined. An improved scheme for tram transportation in Sofia was proposed. The scheme makes it possible to increase the frequency of the trams by 13%, to reduce the zero mileage of rolling stock, and to reduce carbon dioxide pollution by 11%.

References

1. Żak J. Kurek D. Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Trams based on Customers’ Specifications (Expectations) in Selected Countries Transp. Res. Procedia 2020 47 696 703 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.149
2. Djouani I. Dehimi S. Redjem A. Evaluation of the efficiency and quality of the tram route of Setif city, Algeria: Combining AHP and GIS approaches J. Geogr. Inst. Jovan Cvijic SASA 2022 72 85 102 10.2298/IJGI2201085D
3. Omer G. Evaluation of the selection of proper metro and tram vehicle for urban transportation by using a novel integrated MCDM approach Sci. Prog. 2021 104 0036850420950120
4. He J. Xu Y. Li Y. Yang J. Long S. An optimization model of tram timetables considering various signal priority strategies Sci. Rep. 2022 12 16564 10.1038/s41598-022-19762-9
5. Alkubaisi M.I.T. Predefined Evaluating Criteria to Select the Best Tramway Route J. Traffic Logist. Eng. 2014 2 211 217 10.12720/jtle.2.3.211-217
6. Borghetti F. Colombo C.G. Longo M. Mazzoncini R. Somaschini C. Development of a new urban line with innovative trams Urban Marit. Transp. 2021 204 167 178
7. Kulesz B. Sikora A. Comparison of different tram cars in Poland basing on drive type, rated power and energy consumption MATEC Web Conf. 2018 180 02006 10.1051/matecconf/201818002006
8. Cano A. Arjvalo P. Benavides D. Jurado F. Sustainable tramway, techno-economic analysis and environmental effects in an urban public transport. A comparative study Sustain. Energy Grids Netw. 2021 26 100462 10.1016/j.segan.2021.100462
9. Zhao X. Sun Q. Liu L. Ding Y. Shi R. Analysis on Operational Cost of Modern Tram Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Civil Engineering and Transportation (ICCET 2015) Guangzhou, China 28–29 November 2015
10. Xing Z. Zhu J. Zhang Z. Qin Y. Jia L. Energy consumption optimization of tramway operation based on improved PSO algorithm Energy 2022 258 124848 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124848
11. Görçün F. Pamucar D. Küçükönder H. Selection of tramcars for sustainable urban transportation by using the modified WASPAS approach based on Heronian operators Appl. Soft Comput. 2024 151 111127 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111127
12. Canbulut G. Köse E. Arik O.A. Public transportation vehicle selection by the grey relational analysis method Public Transp. 2022 14 367 384 10.1007/s12469-021-00271-3
13. Janiak M.K. Zak J. Multiple criteria evaluation of different redesign variants of the public tram system Transp. Res. Procedia 2014 3 690 699 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.048
14. Kiciński M. Solecka K. Application of MCDA/MCDM methods for an integrated urban public transportation system—Case study, city of Cracow Arch. Transp. 2018 46 71 84 10.5604/01.3001.0012.2107
15. Rydlewski M. Tubis A. Criteria for Assessing the Safety and Functionality of Tram Stops Sustainability 2022 14 13162 10.3390/su142013162
16. Dudek M. Solecka K. Richter M. A multi-criteria appraisal of the selection of means of urban passenger transport using the Electre and AHP methods Tech. Trans. 2018 6 79 93 10.4467/2353737xct.18.088.8693
17. Budzynski M. Tubis A. Jamroz K. Identifying Selected Tram Transport Risks IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019 603 042053 10.1088/1757-899X/603/4/042053
18. Megna G. Bracciali A. Technical Comparison of Commercially Available Trams and Review of Standardization Frame and Design Principles Urban Rail Transit 2022 8 16 31 10.1007/s40864-021-00163-6
19. Skiba M. A selection analysis of solutions for temporary tram traffic organisation employed in wroclaw Transp. Probl. 2023 18 169 178 10.20858/tp.2023.18.1.14
20. Guerrieri M. Catenary-Free Tramway Systems: Functional and Cost-Benefit Analysis for a Metropolitan Area Urban Rail Transit 2019 5 289 309 10.1007/s40864-019-00118-y
21. Czerepicki A. Krukowicz T. Górka A. Szustek J. Traffic Light Priority for Trams in Warsaw as a Tool for Transport Policy and Reduction of Energy Consumption Sustainability 2021 13 4180 10.3390/su13084180
22. He J. Li Y. Long S. Xu Y. Chen J. Energy-efficient tram speed trajectory optimization considering the influence of the traffic light Front. Energy Res. 2022 10 963275 10.3389/fenrg.2022.963275
23. Pavkova K. Currie G. Delbosc A. Sarvi M. Selecting tram links for priority treatments—The Lorenz Curve approach J. Transp. Geogr. 2016 55 101 109 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.07.011
24. Lasdon L.S. Waren A.D. Jain A. Ratner M. Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 1978 4 34 50 10.1145/355769.355773
25. Chapra S. Canale R. Numerical Methods for Engineers 6th ed. McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA 2009 968
26. Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Electricity Generation in Europe, European Environment Agency 14 June 2024 Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/greenhouse-gas-emission-intensity-of-1 (accessed on 1 July 2024)
27. Munier N. A Strategy for Using Multi? Criteria Analysis in Decision? Making Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2011
28. Hwang C.L. Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, a State-of-the-Art Survey Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 1981
29. Brans J.P. Mareschal B. Vincke P. PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in MCDM Operational Research’84 (IFORS’84) Brans J.P. Springer New York, NY, USA 1984 Volume 84 477 490
30. Brans J.P. Vincke P. Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1986 24 228 238 10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5
31. Brans J.P. Mareschal B. PROMETHEE Methods Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys International Series in Operations Research & Mana gement Science Book Series (ISOR) Springer New York, NY, USA 2005 Volume 78 163 186
32. Hwang C.-L. Lai Y.-J. Liu T.-Y. A new approach for multiple objective decision making Comput. Oper. Res. 1993 20 889 899 10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V
33. Yoon K. A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1987 38 277 286 10.1057/jors.1987.44
34. Kerzner H. Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling 10th ed. Wiley New York, NY, USA 2009 1112 978-0-470-27870-3

Issue

Copyright MDPI