Autors: Georgiev, K. K., Katsarova, P. C.
Title: Comparative analysis of the results of an experimental study with basic equipment and a specially made one to the INSIZE ISR - C002 roughness tester
Keywords: additive printing, basic equipment, comparative analysis, experiments, fixture, measurement System Analysis (MSA), roughness tester, surface roughness

Abstract: The present research presents a comparative analysis between experiments conducted with basic equipment for a portable INSIZE ISR - C002 roughness tester and a specially made for the purpose attachment to the device. An analysis is made of the proposed basic device for working with a portable roughness tester INSIZE ISR - C002, and its shortcomings have been determined. In order to facilitate the operator's work with the device and obtain more accurate results, a special device is developed. It is designed using CAD/CAM products and manufactured using additive printing (3D printing). The additive printing technology used reduces its cost. The manufactured device is analyzed and its advantages and disadvantages are determined. Experiments are conducted with both devices and a comparative analysis of the obtained results is made. An analysis of the measurement system (MSA) is made, through which the results of the conducted experiments were analyzed. The comparative analysis shows a number of advantages of the new device compared to the basic one, which provide a basis for the formulated conclusions and recommendations.

References

  1. Whitehouse, D. J. (1997). Surface metrology. Measurement science and technology, 8(9), 955.
  2. G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955.
  3. J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.
  4. Hamed, M., Zedan, Y., Samuel, A. M., Doty, H. W., & Samuel, F. H. (2019). Milling parameters of Al-Cu and Al-Si cast alloys. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 104, 3731-3743.
  5. Gadelmawla, E. S., Koura, M. M., Maksoud, T. M., Elewa, I. M., & Soliman, H. H. (2002). Roughness parameters. Journal of materials processing Technology, 123(1), 133-145.
  6. Asakura, T. (1978). Surface roughness measurement. Speckle metrology, 11-49.
  7. Measurement systems analysis (MSA), Reference Manual, Fourth Edition, Copyright 2010 Chrysler Group LLC, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, ISBN#: 978-1-60-534211-5
  8. Dian, M., & Hodinář, L. (2018). The GRR a Fundamental Tool for Dealing with Measurement System Variability. Manufacturing Technology, 18(1), 29-34.
  9. Portable roughness tester INSIZE ISR – C002, available at: https://www.grainger.com/product/INSIZE-Handheld-SurfaceRoughness-463L43, 15.02.2024.
  10. Coppola, B., Cappetti, N., Di Maio, L., Scarfato, P., & Incarnato, L. (2018). 3D printing of PLA/clay nanocomposites: Influence of printing temperature on printed samples properties. Materials, 11(10), 1947.
  11. Hristov, M. H. (2023, September). SPC as an Instrument for Implementation and MSA as an Instrument for Evaluation of NonLinear Object Based Temperature Compensation into Shop Floor CMM. In 2023 15th Electrical Engineering Faculty Conference (BulEF) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
  12. Qiu P., Introduction to Statistical Process Control, 2014 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, ISBN-13: 978-1-4822-2041-4 (eBook - PDF)
  13. https://www.aiag.org/

Issue

Vide. Tehnologija. Resursi - Environment, Technology, Resources, vol. 3, pp. 58-64, 2024, , https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol3.8106

Цитирания (Citation/s):
1. Hristov M.H., Evaluation of Surface Texture of Hydrogen Pressure Regulators, 2025, Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems, issue 3, vol. 12, pp. 797-806, DOI 10.18280/MMEP.120306, issn 23690739, eissn 23690747 - 2025 - в издания, индексирани в Scopus

Вид: публикация в международен форум, публикация в реферирано издание, индексирана в Scopus